Latest thoughts from Labour

The latest report from Labour’s Policy Review makes interesting reading in the light of recent policy from the Coalition. Entitled Qualifications matter: improving the curriculum and assessment for all it contains a lengthy section on careers work. This includes the following paragraphs.

In our work we have been struck by the massive unanimity around the importance of Information, Advice and Guidance. The consensus is overwhelming: good, effective, independent advice and guidance is essential. OECD reaches the same view, and goes further. Their argument is that given the massive complexity of the contemporary labour market, no upper secondary system can be truly effective without an independent advice and guidance function, staffed by appropriately trained professionals.

There is good evidence that employers can play a strong role in careers advice – City and Guilds found that 88 per cent of 16-19 year olds believed that employers were the most useful source of careers advice, and there is every reason to suppose that technology can supplement good careers advice. However, none of this should detract from the core issue: that high quality, independent careers advice by appropriately trained professionals is critical in helping young people, and particularly those at risk, in negotiating the transition from education to work.

This is clearly very welcome and would be very nice if it made it into a Labour manifesto. There are also some areas that needs some further thinking including locating the responsibility for careers provision with the LEPs and a proposal that seems to fine schools for high LEP levels. Nonetheless this does suggest that there is some serious policy thinking going on in the Labour camp.

One comment

  1. Yes, it is certainly encouraging. The reference to a C&G survey is a little odd. Just because young people think employers are a good source of advice doesn’t make it so and the comment ignores all the practical difficulties of that approach. The “fining” of schools with high NEET outcomes is effectively a way of forcing schools in disadvantaged communities to fund guidance. For me this is Labour saying in advance of the election that they aren’t prepared to prioritise IAG for state funding despite the fact that all governments from 1974 to 2010 accepted the need to do this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s